A gentle repetitive tapping sound floats across the grass, broken by shouts of encouragement. It is early-morning training for the Bhopal hockey squad.
The city used to be famous for the sport, and their coach, Khorshid Ali, played for India’s national team in the 1980s – and was on course for Olympic selection.
But as a new Indian team prepares for the London Olympics, Mr Ali wants them to boycott the games – in protest at the event’s sponsorship by Dow Chemical.
The US giant has been in the frame of campaigners ever since it bought the remnants of the Union Carbide corporation, previously the owner of the pesticide plant that leaked tonnes of lethal chemicals over Bhopal on the night of 2 December 1984.
Suffocating in his bedroom, Mr Ali remembers fleeing into the street in panic along with thousands of others.
“After that, I couldn’t play good hockey,” he says. “My stamina and fitness were gone.”
Other Bhopal players do not agree with a boycott, and even Mr Ali admits he is reluctant to take this stand.
And there is virtually no chance of India staying away, especially with its Olympic hopefuls now doing their final training.
But it is a sign of how toxic the legacy of the Bhopal disaster remains. And that cloud has spread over to London.
Many accuse the Indian government of incompetence in the way it handled the aftermath, and of being too soft on Union Carbide for fear of scaring off other foreign investors.
Little has changed in the slums next to the plant, where thousands died when the gas cloud descended as they slept.
Harbo Bai lives in the same cramped two rooms with her husband as they did then. They lost their daughter to the gas. It left him permanently disabled – and now he has got cancer.
Their compensation money all went on paying for medical bills – and now she cannot work because of looking after him.
“If he dies today, I can’t pay for his funeral,” she says. “Look at us – even dogs and cats have a better life.”
New case
Dow Chemical says it has no liability to pay more compensation or to clean up the site, as it bought the remnants of Union Carbide many years after the disaster.
It points out that India’s Supreme Court approved a final settlement of claims long before, back in 1989.
However, the Indian government is now backing a new court case aimed at securing much greater compensation – provoking criticism that it does not respect its own laws.
Some suspect a certain amount of political posturing is behind calls for a boycott, with Indian officials happy to see Dow take the heat as a way of deflecting criticism of their own actions.
The positions of both India’s sports ministry and its Olympic association have been noticeably vague.
Bhopal campaigners, though, insist that by buying Union Carbide, Dow is liable to pay more compensation. Activist Rachna Dhingra says they will keep up the pressure on the Indian government “to do the right thing” and boycott the games.
They jumped at the opportunity to publicise their cause when it emerged Dow was sponsoring the “wrap” around the main stadium.
For their part, both the London organisers and the powerful International Olympic Committee behind them have stood firmly with the company.
It has been an embarrassment for London, though, and privately some British officials wish Dow had never been taken on as a sponsor.
In Bhopal, people wish their city could be known for something other than the world’s worst industrial disaster, maybe even hockey again. But first they want justice.
News Source: BBC
